(disagreement with premise 2.)

I disagree that the best way to uphold what is worthwhile is to promote the conjunction of what is worthwhile for all persons.


A. The best way to uphold the worthwhile is to promote what is best for me.

Refutation

B. The best way to uphold what is worthwhile is to promote what is best for my favorite group of persons (family, tribe, nation, culture, race, sex, species, etc.).

Refutation

C. The best way to uphold what is worthwhile is to maximize the worthwhile from a single standpoint, which the utilitarian, Henry Sidgwick, calls "the point of view of the universe."

Refutation

D. There is no such thing as the worthwhile.

Refutation

E. There is an overarching, impersonal standard of the worthwhile.

Refutation

F. It is not (as) worthwhile to respect what is worthwhile for all persons.

Refutation

G. We can count beings by degrees: the degree to which they manifest the greatest conceivable number of goods that a being may realize.

Refutation

H. The best way to uphold the worthwhile is to promote less than the conjunction of what is worthwhile for all persons.

Refutation

RETURN TO MAIN ARGUMENT

HOME